As the "Gang of Eight" US Senators
continue to hammer out the blueprint for comprehensive immigration reform,
locally in Southern California, protestors have stepped up efforts against deportations ahead of any
proposed immigration bill. In light of the Obama Administration's record number
of deportations (most by any president in one term), Inland Empire activists
from San Bernardino and Riverside counties are alleging that Customs and Border Patrol agents are targeting undocumented
immigrants, especially Latino workers, without proper evidence.
According to a March 12, 2013 article in the Press
Enterprise, activists want an end to all deportations for undocumented
immigrants who have not committed serious crimes - a moratorium of sorts -
while comprehensive immigration reform talks continue in the halls of Congress. They also want authorities to stop targeting "day laborers", a proposal that is met with mixed opinion.
On the flip side, one Congressman, Representative Duncan
Hunter R-Alpine, has called for increased border security ahead of any
comprehensive immigration reform. Public opinion falls somewhere in the middle
of this debate between increased border security and halting deportation,
according to Dan Schnur, director
of the Jesse M. Unruh Institute of Politics at USC and a former Republican
strategist.
The Obama Administration has repeatedly said it only
targets those undocumented immigrants convicted of serious crimes, recent
border crossers, and those who have violated US immigration laws in the past.
However, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement statistics invalidate those
claims: only 19% of those deported in 2012 were convicted of the most serious
crimes (murder, rape, drug trafficking, etc.), 12% were convicted of less
serious felonies or multiple misdemeanors, and 41% were recent border crossers or had violated US immigration
law in the past (re-entering the US after being deported). That leaves 28% remaning - those who do not fit into the aforementioned categories - deported for
relatively minor violations and a rather large exception to the
Administration's oft-stated policy on deportation.
Arguments rage on both sides in this heated debate
over immigration. While this office attempts to take a neutral stance on
this blog, we still nevertheless believe that those convicted of minor
offenses, no offenses, and are not recent border crossers or repeat violators,
should not strain an already burdened immigration removal system when there are
"bigger fish to fry". Nor should people who are lawful permanent
residents (have a "green card") and have resided here for lengthy
periods of time, be torn apart from their families for relatively minor drug
offenses (see e.g. INA Section 237(a)(2)(B)(i) "General Classes of
Deportable Aliens: Offenses Related to Controlled Substances).
Deportation is a thorny issue, is emotional charged, and can have the possibility of tearing families apart. It would be relieving if existing US immigration laws regarding deportability are re-written as a part of comprehensive immigration reform - in a way that ensures fairness, compassion, accountability, and allows for some real and honest flexibility in certain cases - while also keeping our country safe and secure.
If you or a loved one are apprehended by ICE and
placed into removal proceedings, it is essential that you consult with a
qualified and experienced immigration attorney who can advise you of all
possible forms of relief. We hope you consider calling this office at
949-440-3240, an attorney would be happy to speak to you. You can also visit www.kpimmigrationlaw.com
to learn more about removal (deportation) and other areas of immigration law
such as employment-sponsored immigration and family-sponsored immigration.
No comments:
Post a Comment